Callous Fraudsters Jailed for £60million HIV Cure Scam

Callous Fraudsters Jailed for £60million HIV Cure Scam

Two Fraudsters have been jailed for a total of 14 and a half years after using HIV research to try and steal £60million through a fraudulent tax avoidance scheme.

Antony Blake, 68, and John Banyard, 70, used their company, Ethical Trading and Marketing Ltd, attract wealthy investors with the promise of avoiding tax by supporting tree planting in the Amazon and research for a HIV cure.

World-renowned conservation scientist, Professor Ian Swingland, 72, authenticated fake documents and added credibility to the scheme.

Fake scientific reports and photos were used to claim fraudulent expenses, which was submitted to the HMRC, but no evidence showed this to be true.

Investors were able to claim tax rebates on the losses that the businesses apparently generated, or lower their tax bills, by offsetting losses against £160 million of income, attempting to avoid £60 million in tax. The majority of repayments claimed were withheld by HMRC.

On 3 March 2017, the men were found guilty, after a trial at Southwark Crown Court that began in September 2016. Antony Blakey was jailed for seven and a half years on 10 March 2017; revised to nine years at the Court of Appeal on 25 May 2017. John Banyard was jailed for four and a half years; revised to five and a half years at the Court of Appeal, on the same dates. Professor Ian Swingland was sentenced to a two year sentence, suspended for 18 months.

Tax implications on gifting property before death

Tax implications on gifting property before death

This unusual case came to us following the clients’ father passing away. The deceased father had gifted some properties to the children two years before death following advice on signing a retrospective deed of trust. We were asked to check whether the retrospective deed of trust stood for tax law purposes. Having reviewed the case we concluded that advice received was incorrect and the transfers to children were chargeable transfers for capital gains tax purposes. There was a substantial capital gains tax liability on the transfers that had not been reported but was now due on the estate of the deceased father. Unfortunately the father passed away within two years of gifting the properties which meant that these would be included in his estate for inheritance tax purposes at full value and that taper relief would not be available. To make matters even worse, if the children were to sell a property to pay for the late father’s capital gains and inheritance tax, they would first pay capital gains tax on the disposal of the property. A disclosure needed to be made by the executors of the late father’s estate in relation to the unpaid capital gains tax liabilities. There were easy steps that could have been taken to avoid all the tax charges had advice been taken from a specialist tax firm.

Our analysis: This was one of the worst cases of bad tax advice we have seen and we felt very sorry for our clients who were having to suffer the implications. When transferring properties to children or relatives, it is imperative that tax advice is taken from a firm that specializes in tax law and in writing to avoid small and easy to handle issues becoming out of control.

HMRC withdraw Tax Tribunal Case against Churchill Tax Advisers’ client

HMRC withdraw Tax Tribunal Case against Churchill Tax Advisers’ client

This case came to us several years ago from another firm of accountants. It involved a take away/ restaurant being under investigation by HMRC’s VAT team and assessments being raised. We challenged the assessments as being unreasonable putting forward our strong technical arguments. Unfortunately, HMRC inspector was not willing to accept and we had to appeal to the Tribunal. Shortly before the Tribunal hearing and whilst exchanging statement of case, HMRC’s litigation office wrote to us to state that they will be settling the appeal by agreement. We are grateful to the HMRC’s Solicitor’s Office for having critically reviewed the case before the hearing and deciding that it was not worth pursuing. This victory was great news for our client who had been under stress for a long period. Please click here to view HMRC’s letter settling the Tribunal case by agreement.

Our analysis: This was an interesting case where HMRC had taken a strong stance on their technical position. We have come across a number of such cases previously and have experienced that either the client or their accountant give in to HMRC’s position to avoid going to Tribunal. We have written on numerous occasions previously that just because an HMRC’s inspector takes a particular view does not mean it is necessarily correct according to the legislation and case law. In this case, our technical arguments were very strong but the HMRC caseworker was not willing to consider. Finally prior to the hearing at the Tribunal when the case was reviewed by HMRC’s litigation office, they accepted our position and settled by agreement. This case once again demonstrates the importance of seeking specialist advice from a reputed firm when under a tax investigation.

Offshore tax restructuring of business

Offshore tax restructuring of business

This client came to us following a recommendation by their own accountant for specialist tax advice. The client had a successful retail business including online sales. The existing business model meant that it was paying more corporation tax and VAT than it needed to. After thorough research of the legislation and HMRC guidance, we were able to propose a better business structure that would mitigate the corporation tax as well as VAT liabilities. Whilst majority of the tax planning was within the UK, the new structure also included elements of offshore tax planning which meant the UK corporation tax liability would be reduced.

Our analysis: The key for business growth is to have the right structure including a long term tax strategy. Once set up properly, the tax benefits can be reaped over a number of years bringing a significant return on investment for the specialist advice taken. We have come across a number of situations where businesses have grown without considering a long term tax strategy. The cost of then re-modelling a matured structure is usually quite high